* User Info

 
 
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

* Who's Online

  • Dot Guests: 14
  • Dot Hidden: 0
  • Dot Users: 0

There aren't any users online.

* Downloads for Forum Members

* Board Stats

  • stats Total Members: 13
  • stats Total Posts: 10030
  • stats Total Topics: 1719
  • stats Total Categories: 4
  • stats Total Boards: 22
  • stats Most Online: 72

Author Topic: Words we use incorrectly  (Read 922 times)

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Words we use incorrectly
« on: February 24, 2018, 06:04:16 PM »
Redundant
Maybe it’s the re- prefix that makes it so easy to mistakenly pair redundant with repetitive. It also doesn’t help that the word sounds like “re-done-dant,” as in “I’ve already done that, so I don’t need to redo it.” Rather than “redoing,” redundant relates to “over-doing.”

Tracing back to its medieval origins, redundant means “overflowing” in Latin. A good example of redundant can refer to writing, especially when it is verbose, overwrought, and tedious



genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2018, 06:05:21 PM »
Travesty
“That poor boy lost his father. What a travesty.” Many people would understand the speaker to mean tragedy, because the loss of a loved one is a tragic circumstance. However, travesty is not a synonym for tragedy, and the distinction between the terms is well worth remembering.

Travesty means “a grotesque or debased likeness or imitation.” For those who understand this meaning, misusing travesty in place of tragedy could result in seriously offending the listener.

However, if someone’s in a sham of a relationship, you could describe it as a travesty and tragedy and be just fine. Hopefully, it’s not you!

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2018, 06:07:36 PM »
Disinterested
Disinterested is a usual suspect in the lineup of easily-confused words. The dis- prefix invokes both the hardened sense of “not interested” (as in disapprove, dislike) and “dissing” (disparage, dismiss). But, the primary definition of this word is actually unrelated to the expression of selfish, negative emotions. In fact, it’s associated with the state of being unbiased, or “not influenced by selfish motives.”

A disinterested person may very well be interested and curious about a matter at hand, but he or she doesn’t wish to take sides with the issue or show prejudice through personal motivations. For clarity, a person who doesn’t take an interest in something is simply “not interested.”

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2018, 06:09:47 PM »
i.e. / e.g.
More confusing than Stephen Hawking’s theories, i.e. and e.g. take the cake of this slideshow.

In Latin, i.e. stands for id est, meaning “that is.” It is used whenever you want to restate (in different words) the point you’re trying to make. Think of i.e. as in other words and use the i in in to remember how to use it. “My stomach is making growling sounds, i.e., (“in other words”) I’m hungry.”

And, e.g. stands for exempli gratia, or “for the sake of example.” You can remember how to use this correctly by thinking of “example give,” the strange-sounding reverse of “give [an] example.” “My stomach is making growling sounds, e.g., (“for example”) gurgles, plops, swishes, and bleets.”

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #4 on: February 24, 2018, 06:12:01 PM »
Peruse
The primary definition of peruse does not mean “to skim or glance,” which people so often associate with the term. So many people have used this term wrong, it’s now made it into the dictionary! That’s impressive.

However, the underlying and long-standing definition relates to the “leisurely” pace of reading a document as the reader takes the time to thoroughly review what’s been written. Based on the Middle English use of per- meaning “completely,” peruse has meant to “read carefully” since the 1500s.

Luce

  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • I've never been so happy in all my life...
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2018, 03:12:53 AM »
Well, this is paramount when writing period drama! They're all 'Austen' language!
Thanks for sharing, Genie!
Eagerly waiting for more!
QUEEN UNDER THE MOUNTAIN

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2018, 02:22:38 PM »
Well, this is paramount when writing period drama! They're all 'Austen' language!
Thanks for sharing, Genie!
Eagerly waiting for more!

I think I'm guilty of DISINTERESTED and REDUNDANT.

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #7 on: February 25, 2018, 02:29:23 PM »
FREE REIGN  vs  FREE REIN

A king has free reign of his kingdom. Everything is smooshed under his thumb, from the vassals slaving in his fields to the court jesters doing the chicken dance at banquets. When the king learns his “reign” is just an eggcorn, he’s going to be pissed. In fact, the king disappears entirely from the picture, as does the idea that free reign means strict rule over all things.

Instead, enter a horse and its rider who holds the horse’s reins or straps that control the animal’s movements. The true phrase free rein is almost the opposite of what’s described above: The rider loosens his grip on the reins, giving the horse more freedom to move how it wants. Having free rein means freedom from control . . . not controlling others’ freedoms.

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #8 on: February 25, 2018, 02:34:54 PM »
FOR ALL INTENSIVE PURPOSES   vs   FOR ALL INTENTS AND PURPOSES

When you're trying to make a point, but you don't want to seem to self-righteous or like a know-it-all, you tend to whip out this phrase to lighten the mood.

But, what the heck is an intensive purpose?

Well, an intensive purpose means nothing in terms of this phrase, because it's actually for all intents and purposes.

Intents and purposes are essentially synonyms, so this phrase is redundant, but the redundancy works well to convey the meaning of all purposes.

For the most part, use the above phrase. But, purposes can be intensive. Your purpose to work out at the gym five times a week for three-hour stretches would be characterized by a crazy (questionable) degree of intensity (i.e., “All my intensive purposes at the gym are paying off”).

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #9 on: February 25, 2018, 02:36:07 PM »
TOW THE LINE  vs  TOE THE LINE


When you're getting to close to messing something up or when you're about to really piss someone off, you're towing the line.

Wait . . . this one isn't right?

Okay, to clarify, tow the line would work perfectly well in a nautical sense: A sailor flings rope to a receiver on land who physically tugs, pulls, and tows the line attached to the boat until the vessel is safely docked and secured. It’s a metaphor for “working hard.” Lovely, but not what the phrase means.

Instead, the true phrase is toe the line. Yes, imagine your little tootsies kissing a line on the ground. The expression comes from an old practice common in schools, the military, and other institutions where daily roll-call was the norm. Individuals had to toe the line, or ensure they were perfectly lined up, standing at attention to yell “Here!” or receive orders. The original phrase is about obeying the rules.

genie

  • Monarch
  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 5161
  • oof!
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2018, 02:40:54 PM »
BECKON CALL   vs   BECK AND CALL


I'm at your beckon call, you can count on me. Well, actually . . .

To beckon is "to summon or call someone." So, a beckon call is a “call call.” Ok, then.

The real phrase is beck and call. The phrase is often used in the fuller form, to be at one’s beck and call, which means "to be freely available to someone and comply with their requests or demands."
This is kind of understandable, because being at somebody’s beck and call means the person is always ready to be beckoned to do something.


Luce

  • Royalty
  • *****
  • Posts: 2706
  • I've never been so happy in all my life...
Re: Words we use incorrectly
« Reply #11 on: February 26, 2018, 02:34:17 AM »
All too true!

As a non-English-speaker writing in English, those mistakes are a nightmare to me.
I always, always check out almost every word I write.

Remember my necklace/neckless and sleigh/slay mistakes, Oso? You did me a great favour, then, by pointing them out to me.

What helps me a lot, is listening to an audiobook whilst reading the text.
And the BBC's subtitels, of course.

BTW, I'm in desperate need of a proofreader! Just to point out my silly mistakes.
QUEEN UNDER THE MOUNTAIN

 


* BBC Films

* The Guardian (Film)

  • post Send us your questions for Mike Leigh - 20 September
  • The Observer New Review asks you to put your questions to the much-loved director ahead of the release of his new film, Peterloo
    Mike Leigh is one of the country?s most beloved and respected film-makers. A versatile and humanist director, he has explored themes as diverse as camping holidays in Nuts in May (1976), middle-class soirees in Abigail?s Party (1977), adoption and class in Secrets & Lies (1996), illegal abortion in Vera Drake (2004), unusual driving lessons in Happy-Go-Lucky (2008), and, in 2014?s Mr Turner, the final years of the Romantic painter. Related: Mike Leigh's Peterloo: first trailer for drama about the notorious massacre Continue reading...
  • post James Bond 25: True Detective's Cary Fukunaga named as director - 20 September
  • Beasts of No Nation director Fukunaga confirmed to take over from Danny Boyle on new film starring Daniel CraigDanny Boyle?s replacement as director of the 25th James Bond film has been named as Cary Fukunaga, best known for helming HBO?s True Detective. In a statement released on Thursday, producers confirmed the hire of the Beasts of No Nation film-maker, saying: ?We are delighted to be working with Cary. His versatility and innovation make him an excellent choice for our next James Bond adventure.? Continue reading...
  • post The Big Lebowski review ? The Dude bowls back the years - 20 September
  • Twenty years on, the Coen brothers? comic masterpiece is sleeker and sharper, with even more menace and mysteryAfter 20 years, the shaggy-dog-stoner LA noir that could be the Coens? comic masterpiece rolls back on to the big screen, as light and insouciant as the tumbleweed from the old west that drifts incongruously up to the city in the opening sequence. In fact, after two decades, the film looks weirdly less shaggy, less dishevelled to me: sleeker, sharper, more integrated and with more menace, more mystery. (I found myself thinking of Thomas Pynchon and Lynch?s Mulholland Drive). Sam Elliott?s basso profundo narrator, topping and tailing the action and appearing enigmatically in the middle, creates a fascinating residue of unease. But there are just as many laughs.Our sub-Chandleresque hero is Jeffrey ?The Dude? Lebowski, unforgettably played by Jeff Bridges: a younger or more lightweight actor would have made this character seem merely silly. He is a man whose plot function is so close to that of the classic private eye that he is mistaken for one by another private eye late on in the film. Continue reading...
  • post Queercore: behind a documentary reliving the gay punk movement - 20 September
  • As the origins of the radical subculture are explored in a new film director Yony Leyser and key figure Bruce LaBruce discuss its relevancy todayDirector Yony Leyser calls queercore ?a farce that became real?, while film-maker Bruce LaBruce labels it a respite for ?the fringe of the fringe?.LaBruce is uniquely qualified to make his claim. Thirty years ago, he and fellow Toronto artist GB Jones started what later became known as queercore, a fake movement that somehow morphed into a genuine one. ?People thought that Toronto was the center of this hardcore movement,? says LaBruce in a new documentary directed by Leyser titled Queercore: How To Punk A Revolution. ?But it was just me and two women who sat in their basement and churned out alternative publications and experimental movies.? Continue reading...
  • post Faces Places review ? Agnès Varda's spectacular odd-couple odyssey - 20 September
  • The 90-year-old director goes on the road with street artist JR to create remarkable, moving portraits of the people they meetThere?s a wonderful warmth and playful indirectness to this essay/road movie in the classic nouvelle vague spirit, conjuring a semi-accidental narrative in the midst of what is ostensibly a documentary. It is a collaboration between the legendary 90-year-old director Agnès Varda and the 35-year-old French street artist who styles himself simply JR and always wears a hat and dark glasses, indoors and out ? an opaque mannerism, almost a disguise, which Varda compares to her old comrade Jean-Luc Godard, and which irritates her a little bit. Continue reading...
  • post Never Here review ? dark, disturbing surveillance thriller - 20 September
  • In his last screen role, Sam Shepard plays an art dealer whose affair with a young conceptual artist leads to disquieting questions of identitySam Shephard makes his final screen appearance in this flawed, but intriguing and often very disturbing work from film-maker Camille Thoman ? surveillance thriller and noir nightmare, combined. He plays Paul Stark, a New York art dealer who is representing and indeed having an affair with Miranda Fall (Mireille Enos), a fashionable young conceptual artist with a critically acclaimed but scandalous new installation currently on show. Miranda had discovered someone?s mobile phone in the street, and used all the photos in it as an exhibition devoted to this total stranger, meditating on the mystery of identity. The victim himself is of course astonished and furious, and shows up angrily on the opening night, creating a miasma of unease. Continue reading...
  • post Toronto 2018 roundup: popcorn, syrup and a convict in space - 15 September
  • While Steve McQueen and Barry Jenkins led the hype for Oscars, it was veteran director Claire Denis?s bizarre sci-fi High Life that really caught the eyeThe Toronto international film festival is an increasingly glitzy affair, with enough world premieres from celebrated auteurs to have even casual moviegoers frothing at the mouth ? and critics positively weak at the knees. Courting the sweet spot between art house and mainstream, it?s a prime destination for Oscar contenders opening on the festival circuit (taking place just after Venice and the prestigious though less well-known Telluride). Distribution deals are made in high-rise hotels, and celebrities roam the streets like civilians.The festival may be a hype machine, but the hype itself is as fragile as a bubblegum balloon. Praise swelled around Steve McQueen?s Widows, a wildly entertaining female-led crime thriller co-written by the director with the author of Gone Girl, Gillian Flynn, and set on the mean streets of Chicago?s South Side. Viola Davis is Veronica, widow of Liam Neeson?s criminal Harry Rawlings and inheritor of a sizable debt in the wake of his last, bungled job. McQueen?s previous three films were elegant and sombre, and interested in how bodies do and don?t yield to violence inflicted by the self, society and the state. The altogether lighter, slighter Widows feels like a sharp left turn: the artist-director has made an almost trashy popcorn movie with a sly sense of humour, indulging in adrenaline-pumping, car-chase set pieces and soapy parodies of seedy politicians. It?s a little top heavy and rushes its conclusion, but it?s exciting to see McQueen having so much fun. Continue reading...
  • post Boy Erased review ? plodding gay conversion drama lacks power - 12 September
  • Strong performances from Lucas Hedges and Nicole Kidman aren?t enough to bring a disappointingly pedestrian tale to lifeThe isolating process of becoming aware of one?s sexuality, being forced by societal constraints to deny it and then finally dealing with the often difficult after-effects that follow coming out, or being forced out, can be deeply traumatic and difficult to explain to those who haven?t endured it themselves. In Boy Erased, this experience is brought to the screen within a particularly harrowing framework, based on the memoir from Garrard Conley. Related: Red Joan review ? Judi Dench's 'granny spy' brings OAP to the KGB Continue reading...
  • post Red Joan review ? Judi Dench's 'granny spy' brings OAP to the KGB - 12 September
  • Dench is a pensioner pulled up for her wartime sympathies in a stodgy espionage drama that can?t disguise its mediocrity?No one suspects us because we?re women,? smiles one feminine conspirator to another in Trevor Nunn?s wartime spy drama Red Joan. Never mind all the espionage and atomic physics, this movie is really about the dangers of underestimating women. Our Joan is patronised in two different eras of her life, both as the pensioner charged with treason and as a demure Cambridge scientist in the 1940s, who slips nuclear secrets to the Soviets on the sly.The older Joan, played all too briefly by Judi Dench, is a retired and softly spoken librarian apparently engrossed in watercolours and gardening. Her friends, neighbours and even her adult sonare flabbergasted when the police come knocking. Surely the old dear can?t have snow on her boots? These dopes haven?t clocked her Che Guevara coffee mug. As the police interrogate her, flashbacks take us back to her youth as a susceptible student, singled out by conniving communists at a screening of Battleship Potemkin. Continue reading...
  • post The Old Man and the Gun review ? Redford radiates swagger and class - 12 September
  • The film feels like a homage to Redford, who will surely earn a final best actor Oscar nomination for his performanceRobert Redford?s career ends not with a bang but a caper, the sort that he might have romped through half a century ago. Reportedly Redford?s final film, The Old Man and the Gun will surely earn the the 82-year-old one final best actor Oscar nomination for a performance of immense swagger and class.It?s directed by David Lowery, who is fast gaining a reputation as one of the harder-to-pin down talents currently working in Hollywood. Anyone who struggled with Lowery?s last film, the peculiar metaphysical drama A Ghost Story, might expect something similarly chewy this time around. But he was also responsible for a faithful recent remake of Disney?s Pete?s Dragon (which also featured Redford), and here creates a film that cleaves so closely to the aesthetic of 60s/early 70s Hollywood that it might as well be pickled in aspic. Continue reading...

* CinemaBlend

* Guardian - Film

* Calendar

September 2018
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 [20] 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30

No calendar events were found.